With the emergence of secularism and the transformation of social values, attitudes toward divorce are changing. Therefore, investigating the perspectives of religious followers regarding these changes is essential for understanding the future dynamics of family structures and the role of religion in contemporary society. This study aimed to examine the impact of religious affiliation and beliefs on attitudes toward divorce and its acceptance. Using data from the World Values Survey, information from 72,000 individuals across 60 countries was analyzed. The findings revealed that Muslims exhibited the highest importance of religion in life and participation in religious ceremonies, while non-religious individuals showed the lowest levels. Non-religious individuals had the highest acceptance of divorce. Among followers of different religions, Jews demonstrated the highest acceptance scores, while Muslims had the lowest. Multivariate analysis indicated that even after controlling for individual, religious, and cultural characteristics, religion still had a significant impact on attitudes toward divorce. Overall, positive attitudes toward divorce and its acceptance were higher among non-religious individuals, secularists, post-materialists, libertarians, those with low religious participation, men, rural residents, and those with secondary or university education. These findings emphasize that despite the spread of secularism, religion remains a powerful and influential force shaping attitudes and plays a key role in family structures. The results can contribute to raising awareness about the impact of secular and religious factors on Iranian family structures. Therefore, policymakers should design programs to strengthen family cohesion and reduce divorce acceptance among various groups.
اخلاصی، ابراهیم؛ رستگار، یاسر؛ خرم، منوچهر. (1397). آموزههای دینی و مناسبات خانواده و زناشویی؛ مورد مطالعه: زوجین شهر بندرعباس.فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 25(82): 128-99. https: //doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2018.26242.1663
امام جمعهزاده، سیدجواد؛ رحیمی، رئوف؛ حاتمی نسب، سیدحسن. (1391). انقلاب خاموش در جوامع فرا صنعتی: تغییر در اولویت ارزشها. پژوهشهای سیاسی جهان اسلام، 2(3)، 61-85. http: //priw.ir/article-1-103-fa.html
ایسپا، مرکز افکارسنجی دانشجویان ایران. (1397). چهار باور مذهبی، هشتاد درصد جمعیت جهان را دربرگرفته است. شنبه، 15 اردیبهشت، در دسترس در: https: //ispa.ir
برخورداری، عزتالله. (1400). طلاق و شرایط صحت آن در قرآن و قانون مدنی، نشریه مطالعات قرآنی، 12(48)، 149-169. https: //doi.org/10.30495/qsf.2021.687503
بگی، میلاد؛ حسینی، حاتم. (۱۴۰۰). تفاوتهای نسلی در نگرش نسبت به طلاق در ایران: کاربرد الگوی چند سطحی، پژوهشهای راهبردی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 10(3): 44-23. https: //doi.org/10.22108/srspi.2021.132060.1764
جهانگیری مغانلو، نسرین؛ کرد، خدیجه. (1401). بررسی تأثیر آموزههای دینی بر رضایت از زندگی و پیشگیری از طلاق در زوجین، هفتمین کنفرانس ملی رویکردهای نوین در آموزش و پژوهش. محمودآباد. در دسترس در: https: //civilica.com/doc/1619971
ربیپور، محمدعلی. (1386). نگرش اسلام به موضوع ازدواج و طلاق و مقایسه تطبیقی آنها با آیینهای یهودیت و مسیحیت. فصلنامه علامه، (15)، 79-59.
قاسمی، فاطمه؛ عسکریزاده، قاسم؛ موسوینسب، سید محمد حسین. (1398). رابطۀ ویژگیهای شخصیت، نگرش مذهبی و رضایت جنسی با گرایش به طلاق در زنان پیراپزشک شهر کرمان در سال ۹۵-۱۳۹۴. پژوهش در دین و سلامت، 5(4)، 33-20.https: //doi.org/10.22037/jrrh.v5i4.19860
کریمی، اعظم. (1400). بررسی و تحلیل نگرش جوانان به ازدواج و فرزندآوری. مطالعات راهبردی ورزش و جوانان، 20(25)، 292-275. https: //faslname.msy.gov.ir/article_452.html
کلینى، محمد بن یعقوب. (1407ق). الکافی، (غفارى على اکبر و آخوندى، محمد). تهران: دار الکتب الإسلامیة.
مفتاح، احمد رضا؛ عبداللهی، محمدحسن. (1396). مسئلۀ طلاق در کلیسای کاتولیک معاصر. پژوهشهای ادیانی، 5(9)، 28-5. https: //adyan.urd.ac.ir/article_111567.html
متقی هندی، علی ابن حسام الدین. (1364ق). کنز العمال فی سنن الاقوال والافعال. حیدرآباددکن: دائرة المعارف العثمانیه.
Amato, P. R. (1994). The Impact of Divorce on Men and Women in India and The United States. Shifting the Center: Understanding Contemporary Families, 25(2) , 207-221. https: //www.jstor.org/stable/41602321
Anson, B. (2024). Buddhist Views on Marriage, Retrieved in July 2024 at: https: //www.budsas.org/ebud/whatbudbeliev/237.htm
Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., Branaman, A., & Sica, A. (1995). Belief and behavior: Does religion matter in today's marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 661-671. https: //doi.org/10.2307/353921
Bryant, D. (2006). Reflections on 1 Corinthians 7: 10-11, Retrieved in July 2024 at: https: //donbryant.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/reflections-on-1-corinthians-710-11/
Bystrov, E. (2014). Testing the second demographic transition theory with seemingly unrelated regression: marital postponement and human empowerment. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 483-499. https: //doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu054
Collardeau, F., & Ehrenberg, M. (2016). Parental divorce and attitudes and feelings toward marriage and divorce in emerging adulthood: new insights from a multiway-frequency analysis. Journal of European Psychology Students, 7(1), 24-33. http: //dx.doi.org/10.5334/jeps.341
Dabone, K. T. (2012). Marital Satisfaction Among Married People in Sunyani Municipality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Davie, G. (2023). Revisiting Secularization in Light of Growing Diversity: The European Case. Religions, 14(9), 1119, 1-15. https: //doi.org/10.3390/rel14091119
Diwan, P. (1957). The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 6(2), 263-272. https: //www.jstor.org/stable/755668
Flatt, K. N. (2023). Secularization Theory’s Differentiation Problem: Revisiting the Historical Relationship between Differentiation and Religion. Religions, 14(7), 828, 1-22. https: //doi.org/10.3390/rel14070828
Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing attitudes toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 179-200. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.179
Hagevi, M. (2012). Beyond church and state: Private religiosity and post-materialist political opinion among individuals in Sweden. Journal of Church and State, 54(4), 499-525. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csr121
Hosseinkhanzadeh, A. A., Yeganeh, T., & Mojallal, M. (2013). The relationship of the religious orientations and attitudes with self-control among students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 759-762. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.641
Indelicato, A., & Martín, J. C. (2023). Attitudes towards religions: The impact of being out of the religious group. Religions, 14(10) , 1-16. https: //doi.org/10.3390/rel14101218
Inglehart, R & C. Welzel. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Post modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Kapinus, C. A., & Flowers, D. R. (2008). An examination of gender differences in attitudes toward divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 49(3-4), 239-257. https: //doi.org/10.1080/10502550802222469
Künkler, M., & Shankar, S. (2018). Introduction: A Secular Age beyond the West. A Secular Age beyond the West. Religion, Law and the State in Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, 1-32. https: //doi.org/10.1017/9781108278195
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and development review, 36(2), 211-251. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
Lev-Wiesel, R., & Al-Krenawi, A. (1999). Attitude towards marriage and marital quality: A comparison among Israeli Arabs differentiated by religion. Family Relations, 48, 51-56. https: //doi.org/10.2307/585682
Menski, W. (2009). Hindu law: Beyond tradition and modernity. Oxford University Press.
Mohanty MS (2023). Relationship between Positive Attitude and Marital Separation: The US Evidence, Medical Research Archives, 11(7), 1-14. https: //doi.org/10.18103/mra. v11i7.2.4158
Moniz, J. B. (2023). Secularization in Europe: Causes, Consequences, and Cultural Diversity. Religions, 14(3), 423, 1-11. https: //doi.org/10.3390/rel14030423
Nash, D. (2019). Secularist history: Past perspectives and future prospects. Secularism and Nonreligion, 8(1), 1-9. https: //doi.org/10.5334/snr.113
Olson, J. R., Marshall, J. P., Goddard, H. W., & Schramm, D. G. (2016). Variations in predictors of marital satisfaction across more religious and less religious regions of the United States. Journal of family Issues, 37(12), 1658-1677. https: //psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0192513X14560643
Pew Research Center (2012). The Global Religious Landscape, Retrieved in July 2024 at: https: //www.pewresearch.org/religion/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/
Porzor, P. & Ghorbani polkoe, H. (2023). The role of self-compassion, patience and optimism with an attitude towards Islamic sources in predicting the tendency of couples to divorce. Journal of Family Relations Studies, 3(10), 37-43. https: //doi.org/10.22098/jfrs.2023.12302.1103
Prabhū, P. (1963). Hindu Social Organization: A Study in Socio-psychological and Ideological Foundations. Popular Prakashan.
Simmons, R. S. (2024). Divorce in Judaism, Retrieved in July 2024 at: https: //aish.com/103423494/
Sorokowski, P., Kowal, M., & Sorokowska, A. (2019). Religious affiliation and marital satisfaction: Commonalities among Christians, Muslims, and atheists. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2798, 1-7. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02798
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27-52. https: //www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.21.2.27
Stokes, C. E., & Ellison, C. G. (2010). Religion and attitudes toward divorce laws among US adults. Journal of Family Issues, 31(10), 1279-1304. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10363887
Sullivan, K. T. (2001). Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: an investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. Journal of family psychology, 15(4), 610-626. https: //psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.610
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard university press.
Thornton, A. (1985). Changing attitudes toward separation and divorce: Causes and consequences. American Journal of Sociology, 90(4), 856-872. https: //doi.org/10.1086/228147
United Nations (2020). Crude divorce rate (OWID based on UN, OECD, Eurostat and other sources) – processed by Our World in Data. Accessible on 14 December 2024 at: https: //ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces
Van de Kaa, D. J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review, 27, 290-331. https: //www.jstor.org/stable/3115262
Vincent, P., & D’Mello, L. (2018). Changing trends of divorce in India: Issues & concerns. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences, 3(2), 151-157. http: //dx.doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0053
Weiss, S (2024). Divorce: The Halakhic Perspective, Retrieved in July 2024 at: https: //jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/divorce-halakhic-perspective#: ~: text=A%20woman%20is%20divorced%20in,forced%20divorce%E2%80%9D
World Population Review (2024). Divorce Rates by Country 2024, retrieved in June 2024 at: https: //worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/divorce-rates-by-country
Bagi, M. (2025). The Impact of Religious Affiliation on Reducing Divorce Acceptance in the Age of Secularism. Islamic social studies, 30(130), 5-34. doi: 10.30513/iss.2025.6446.1375
MLA
Bagi, M. . "The Impact of Religious Affiliation on Reducing Divorce Acceptance in the Age of Secularism", Islamic social studies, 30, 130, 2025, 5-34. doi: 10.30513/iss.2025.6446.1375
HARVARD
Bagi, M. (2025). 'The Impact of Religious Affiliation on Reducing Divorce Acceptance in the Age of Secularism', Islamic social studies, 30(130), pp. 5-34. doi: 10.30513/iss.2025.6446.1375
CHICAGO
M. Bagi, "The Impact of Religious Affiliation on Reducing Divorce Acceptance in the Age of Secularism," Islamic social studies, 30 130 (2025): 5-34, doi: 10.30513/iss.2025.6446.1375
VANCOUVER
Bagi, M. The Impact of Religious Affiliation on Reducing Divorce Acceptance in the Age of Secularism. Islamic social studies, 2025; 30(130): 5-34. doi: 10.30513/iss.2025.6446.1375